Luke Hinrichs is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentaries, Chief Justice Roberts pauses reinstatement of NLRB Chairwoman Gwynne Wilcox and MSBP Chairwoman Cathy Harris, former EEOC Commissioner Jocelyn Samuels sues Trump alleging unlawful firing, and unions sue to block Trump executive order targeting collective bargaining agreements at federal agencies that have national security missions.
Chief Justice John Roberts issued an administrative stay to temporarily pause en banc D.C. Circuit’s order that would have reinstated National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Chairwoman Gwynne A. Wilcox and Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) Chairwoman Cathy A. Harris while a panel of the D.C. Circuit court determines the legality of Trump’s firings. The case tests the applicability of longstanding precedent in Humphrey’s Executor v. U.S., and the president’s authority to discharge top officials at certain independent agencies without cause. Trump’s emergency application for the stay also requested that the Supreme Court treat the filing as a petition for certiorari to consider the matter on the merits instead of waiting for an appeal of the D.C. Circuit forthcoming decision. The fired officials are asked to respond to the request by April 15. The administrative stay leaves both the MSPB and the NLRB without a quorum to function.
Former Equal Employment Opportunity Commissioner Jocelyn Samuels sued the Trump administration in D.C. federal court, claiming that her firing in January was unlawful and in violation Title VII of the Civil Rights Act since she was removed without just cause prior to her Senate-confirmed term expiration. Samuels was removed from her position the same day that Trump fired EEOC Chair Charlotte Burrows and General Counsel Karla Gilbride. The firings left the Commission with no quorum to act.
Six unions filed for a temporary restraining order with a federal district court of California to block Trump’s “Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Programs” Executive Order pending further litigation. The executive order would eliminate the collective bargaining rights for hundreds of thousands of federal employees at more than a dozen federal agencies by expanding an existing exception from collective bargaining for workers with duties affecting national security. According to the unions’ filing, the order affects about 75% of federal workers currently represented by unions. The unions involved include the American Federation of Government Employees, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the National Nurses Organizing Committee/National Nurses United, the Service Employees International Union, the National Association of Government Employees, and the National Federation of Federal Employees.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
October 8
In today’s news and commentary, the Trump administration threatens no back pay for furloughed federal workers; the Second Circuit denies a request from the NFL for an en banc review in the Brian Flores case; and Governor Gavin Newsom signs an agreement to create a pathway for unionization for Uber and Lyft drivers.
October 7
The Supreme Court kicks off its latest term, granting and declining certiorari in several labor-related cases.
October 6
EEOC regains quorum; Second Circuit issues opinion on DEI causing hostile work environment.
October 5
In today’s news and commentary, HELP committee schedules a vote on Trump’s NLRB nominees, the 5th Circuit rejects Amazon’s request for en banc review, and TV production workers win their first union contract. After a nomination hearing on Wednesday, the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee scheduled a committee vote on President Trump’s NLRB nominees […]
October 3
California legislation empowers state labor board; ChatGPT used in hostile workplace case; more lawsuits challenge ICE arrests
October 2
AFGE and AFSCME sue in response to the threat of mass firings; another preliminary injunction preventing Trump from stripping some federal workers of collective bargaining rights; and challenges to state laws banning captive audience meetings.