President Donald Trump his nominee to fill the late Justice Scalia’s seat on the Supreme Court this Thursday. Among the rumored candidates is of the 11th Circuit, who two weeks ago. Judge Pryor was appointed by President George W. Bush to his seat in Alabama in 2005 after the Senate voted to confirm him 53–45. From 1995–97, Judge Pryor served as a deputy attorney general of Alabama. He was elected as Alabama’s Attorney General in 1997, at 34 years old, and served in that position until his nomination to the 11th Circuit. Judge Pryor’s record on a variety of legal topics, but did not discuss the judge’s record on labor and employment. We do so here.
Judge Pryor has not developed a particular reputation with respect to labor and employment law, but one impression that emerges from a look at the admittedly few labor and employment opinions he has written or joined is deference to the determinations of the NLRB.
, Judge Pryor has not publicly expressed concern over excessive deference to administrative agencies. His NLRB opinions reflect a preference for deferring to agency interpretations and findings. Out of nine cases he heard in which the NLRB was a party, Judge Pryor sided with the NLRB in eight of them. In seven of these cases, Judge Pryor found that “substantial evidence” supported the NLRB’s determinations. Judge Pryor was part of the unanimous or per curiam opinion in six of these cases. In , Judge Pryor dissented from the majority opinion holding that substantial evidence did not support the NLRB’s decision to not count defendant employer’s licensed practical nurses as supervisors, thereby precluding their attempts to unionize. Criticizing the majority, Judge Pryor wrote, “‘[i]n reweighing the facts and setting aside the Board’s order,’ the majority opinion ‘improper substitute[s] its own views of the facts for those of the Board,’ […] and fails to adhere to our deferential standard of review.” 696 F.3d 1332, 1350 (11th Cir. 2012). He recognized that though some circuits gave a less deferential standard of review to NLRB determinations of who counts as a “supervisor” under § 2(11) of the NLRA, “our Court has refused to make ‘judicial adjustments to the statutory standard of review because we believe the wiser course is a robust application of the standard that has typified review of Board decisions.’” Id. (citations omitted). Continue reading